PCN 525 Topic 8 Marginalized Group Career Counseling Paper (Course Obj.)
Follow Below Link to
Download File
Email us for original
and Plagiarism Free Work At ( info.homeworklance@gmail.com ) or order us at (https://homeworklance.com/custom-order/ )
Details:
For this assignment you will select
a marginalized group (veterans, minorities, individuals with disabilities,
etc.) and write a paper of 1,750 to 2,100 words that can be used as a resource
when working with an individual from the selected group. Use peer-reviewed
resources to support your use of a specific career theory as well as
interventions with this population. The paper should include the following:
1.
An explanation of who the population
is and why it is important for this group to receive career counseling
2.
Statistics on the group (e.g., how
large, how many have employment problems, how many utilize career counseling)
3.
Discussion of career counseling
theory to be used with the group (e.g., Minnesota theory of work adjustment).
Include evidence supporting the use of this theory in the general population as
well as within the group. Please note: If none are available, it is important
to indicate that as well.
4.
Basic plan for counseling utilizing
chosen theory (e.g., interview, use of assessment tools, explanation of theory)
5.
Environmental/personal barriers that
may prevent the client from finding work (e.g., disability, substance use history,
felony, transportation, limited computer access)
6.
Local resources available to help
the client obtain work (e.g., job center, training programs, support groups)
7.
Your conclusion on whether or not
this plan is tenable and will work, based on the information listed above.
8.
A minimum of four scholarly
references.
Prepare this assignment according to
the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success
Center.
This assignment uses a rubric.
Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar
with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this
assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the directions in the Student Success
Center.
This assignment meets the following
CACREP Standards:
2.F.4.a: Theories and models of
career development, counseling, and decision making.
2.F.4.b. Approaches for
conceptualizing the interrelationships among and between work, mental
well-being, relationships, and other life roles and factors.
2.F.4.c. Processes for identifying
and using career, avocational, educational, occupational and labor market
information resources, technology, and information systems.
2.F.4.e. Strategies for assessing
abilities, interests, values, personality and other factors that contribute to
career development.
2.F.4.f. Strategies for career
development program planning, organization, implementation, administration, and
evaluation.
2.F.4.g. Strategies for advocating
for diverse clients’ career and educational development and employment
opportunities in a global economy.
2.F.4.h. Strategies for facilitating
client skill development for career, educational, and life-work planning and
management.
2.F.4.i. Methods of identifying and
using assessment tools and techniques relevant to career planning and decision
making.
2.F.4.j. Ethical and culturally
relevant strategies for addressing career development.
Marginalized Group Career Counseling
Paper (Course Obj.)
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less than Satisfactory 65.00% |
3
Satisfactory 75.00% |
4
Good 85.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
||
|
70.0 %Content
|
||||||
|
10.0 % An explanation of the population and why it is
important they receive career counseling
|
Paper does not include an
explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is
important they should receive career counseling. Paper does not demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes an explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why
it is important they should receive career counseling. Only briefly mentions
the population of interest without explanation of the importance of career
counseling Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic explanation
of the population as well as a discussion about why it is important they
should receive career counseling. Population of interest is mentioned as well
as the importance of career counseling with this population. Paper
demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a thorough
explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is
important they should receive career counseling. Thorough discussion of the
population, and specific problems that may be resolved with career counseling
are included. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the
surface the topic.
|
Paper provides a comprehensive
explanation of the population as well as a discussion about why it is
important they should receive career counseling. Thorough discussion of the
population, and specific problems that may be resolved with career counseling
are well supported with scholarly resources. Paper demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 % Statistics on the group
|
Paper does not include statistics
on the selected group. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes statistics on the selected group. Almost no statistics are mentioned
on the group of interest. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic statistics
on the selected group. Two primary statistics are mentioned but not explained
in depth. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides thorough statistics
on the selected group. Three or more statistics are mentioned and explained
in depth. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface
the topic.
|
Paper provides comprehensive
statistics on the selected group. Three or more statistics are mentioned and
explained. Resources for statistics are evaluated as scholarly. Paper
demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 % A discussion of the career counseling theory to
be used with the group.
|
Paper does not include a
discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected
group. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes a discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the
selected group. Theory is mentioned but not explained. Paper demonstrates
poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic discussion
about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected group. Theory
is mentioned and explained. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the
topic.
|
Paper provides a thorough
discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected
group. Theory is mentioned and explained thoroughly. Paper demonstrates
understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Paper provides a comprehensive
discussion about the career counseling theory to be used with the selected
group. Theory is mentioned and explained thoroughly, supported by statistics
regarding the application to this specific group. Paper demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 % A basic plan for counseling the group that
utilized the chosen theory
|
Paper does not include a
discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the
chosen theory. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes a discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that
utilized the chosen theory. A plan is mentioned but undeveloped. Paper
demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic discussion
about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the chosen theory.
A plan is mentioned and developed basically. Paper demonstrates a basic
understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a thorough
discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the
chosen theory. A plan is developed thoroughly. Paper demonstrates
understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Paper provides a comprehensive
discussion about a basic plan for counseling the group that utilized the
chosen theory. A plan is developed thoroughly or the application to this
specific group including data supporting plan efficacy. Paper demonstrates an
exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 %Environmental/personal
barriers that may prevent the client from finding work (e.g., disability,
substance use history, felony, transportation, limited computer access)
|
Paper does not include a
discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the
client from finding work. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the
topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes a discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may
prevent the client from finding work. Barriers are mentioned but not
analyzed. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic discussion
about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the client from
finding work. Barriers are mentioned and analyzed briefly. Paper demonstrates
a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a thorough
discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the
client from finding work. Barriers are mentioned and analyzed thoroughly but
are general and can apply to any group. Paper demonstrates understanding that
extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Paper provides a comprehensive
discussion about the environmental/personal barriers that may prevent the
client from finding work. Barriers are analyzed thoroughly and appear to
apply to this group specifically. Paper demonstrates an exceptional
understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 % Local resources available to help the client
obtain work (e.g., job center, training programs, support groups)
|
Paper does not include a
discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain
work. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes a discussion about the local resources available to help the client
obtain work. Resources are mentioned but not explored. Paper demonstrates
poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic discussion
about the local resources available to help the client obtain work. Resources
are mentioned but not discussed, contact information is provided. Paper
demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a thorough
discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain
work. Resources are mentioned and discussed, contact information is provided.
Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Paper provides a comprehensive
discussion about the local resources available to help the client obtain
work. Resources specifically target for this group are mentioned and
discussed, contact information is provided. Paper demonstrates an exceptional
understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 % Provide your own opinion on whether this plan is
tenable and if you think if it can work
|
Paper does not include a
discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Paper does not demonstrate
understanding of the topic.
|
Paper only vaguely or incompletely
includes a discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided
but does not reflect the information provided in the paper. Paper
demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Paper provides a basic discussion
about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided and is supported by
the work in the body of the paper. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding
of the topic.
|
Paper provides a thorough
discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided, supported
by the paper and is reasonably accurate with regard to potential efficacy.
Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Paper provides a comprehensive
discussion about the feasibility of the plan. Opinion is provided and
includes both supports and limitations as outlined in the body of the paper.
Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
15.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness
|
||||||
|
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions
|
Paragraphs and transitions
consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between
paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and
scope.
|
Some paragraphs and transitions
may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness.
Some degree of organization is evident.
|
Paragraphs are generally
competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in
their relationships to each other.
|
A logical progression of ideas
between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to
purpose.
|
There is a sophisticated
construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each
other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph
structure is seamless
|
|
|
15.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness
|
||||||
|
10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive
enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical
errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos
are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence
structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of
standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
15.0 %Format
|
||||||
|
5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately
or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but
some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is
apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used.
Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully
used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
|
|
10.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is
inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with
numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be
present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate
to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and
correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is
free of error.
|
|
|
100
% Total Weightage
|
||||||
Comments
Post a Comment